Write your critical evaluation of the article and explain your points using examples from the article. You may want to identify certain types of equipment by vendor name and brand or category e.
Use clear transitions both to keep the discussion moving and to provide closure on issues that are already adequately considered. Multiple articles might be chosen, particularly if they present alternative views of a controversy, or otherwise invite comparison or contrast.
Creative Review the photograph in Posting 7. It is appropriate to report, parenthetically, the source vendor and catalog number for reagents used, e. Consider having a list of questions that invites the group to participate, and that helps lead the group towards the core issues for consideration.
How did literature citations in text differ from those in the literature citation section? The discussion leader is in charge, and should feel comfortable taking charge, if necessary. Be sure you cite the article and provide the DOI or link. Next, review the material, and supplementary material, so as to be sure to understand the content.
In contrast, this example strays subtly into interpretation by referring to optimality a conceptual model and tieing the observed result to that idea: In face-to-face courses, discussions are spontaneous; in online keep students alert, get a few outgoing students involved if naturally progresses or instructor motivates responses through questioning, prompting, additional resources, personal examples, current event that applies.
Avoid repeatedly using a single sentence to relate a single action; this results in very lengthy, wordy passages. The Methods section is prone to being wordy or overly detailed. Do you agree or disagree and why. An inoculating loop was used to transfer culture to the agar surface.
Then you can ask more open- ended questions, such as why? Read the article multiple times, if necessary, to grasp the concepts and be familiar with content. In this example the reader will have no clue as to what the various tubes represent without having to constantly refer back to some previous point in the Methods.
We have developed a simple evaluation sheet that invites all participants to provide the group leader with quick, but meaningful and constructive feedback in the short time that is usually available after a discussion.
Provide visual aids to enhance understanding. Again, remember that a discussion is just that, and the job of the discussion leader is to invite participation by other members of the group. What were the major results? Use the first paragraph of your response to summarize your final topic so your readers can make the connection to your choices from the podcast.
Try alternative organization schemes using outlines in an effort to improve on the logic and flow of the presentation. Keep the discussion moving actively, by avoiding digressions, and returning the discussion to the topic at hand, if necessary. Always identify treatments by the variable or treatment name, NOT by an ambiguous, generic name or number e.
Location data must be as precise as possible: Sherry Science departments at many universities convene regular discussions of contemporary research, journal articles, or even ideas or studies done by group participants.
Leading a discussion of a scientific work is a hybrid of several kinds of skills — leading a discussion group, reading a scientific paper at a meeting, public speaking — but it is different from all of these in interesting ways, which is why I have put together these comments see References below.
Leading a group discussion involves some of the same skills as public speaking, and many books and courses are available on the latter topic e. Be prepared to lead the discussion by asking questions. Post your rough draft for your final paper as an attachment in Discussion Test information for reliability.
Avoid repetitive paragraph structures. Do not interpret the data here. However, many relaxation a.Most journal-style scientific papers are subdivided into the following sections: Title report those results which answer the questions you were asking; identify trends, relative change or differences, etc.
Do not introduce new results in the Discussion. Leading Discussion of a Scientific Journal Article. Leading Discussion of a Scientific Journal Article by T.
W. Sherry. effective writing and presentation, oral communication, and leading group discussions. Be prepared to lead the discussion by asking questions. You may want to start out with yes-no questions to get opinions defined.
How to Write an Effective Discussion Dean R Hess PhD RRT FAARC Introduction Things to Avoid When Writing the Discussion Overinterpretation of the Results Dean R Hess PhD RRT FAARC presented a version of this article at the RESPIRATORY CARE Journal symposium.
In this essay, I’ll break down and demystify the format of an article for a general journal. Note that I’m a sociologist, so my insights are field-specific.
So, too, must I acknowledge that journals, particularly specialty ones, may have their own style of writing, so the articles you read in them may not follow the format I’ll lay out below.
“Perceptions of the Difficulties of Postgraduate L2 Thesis Students Writing the Discussion Section.” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 5 (January ): ; Kretchmer, Paul.
Fourteen Steps to Writing an Effective Discussion Section. Writing an Effective Discussion or Conclusion Section Feb 10, by Amy Benson Brown The last blog in this series focused on the .Download